 |
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
DB
Joined: 25 Aug 2007 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:12 pm Post subject: Rules of Attribution |
|
|
I own 100% of my small corporation. What do I need to know about the "Rules
of Attribution"? Thanks.
Archived from group: misc>taxes |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul Thomas, CPA
Joined: 25 Aug 2007 Posts: 3094
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:59 pm Post subject: Re: Rules of Attribution |
|
|
"DB" wrote
>I own 100% of my small corporation. What do I need to know about the "Rules
>of Attribution"? Thanks.
Do you have reason to believe they apply to you?
http://www.cabusinessadvisor.com/Tax/TaxTraps/Attrib.htm
There are tax rules to prevent excess income splitting. Collectively, the
rules are generally known as the Attribution Rules. Simply stated, if a
taxpayer has at any time transferred or assigned to a non-arm's length
person the right to an amount which would otherwise have been included in
your income, the amount transferred must be included in the transferor
taxpayer's income for the year. Transfers include gifts or a sale, even if
the sale is at Fair Market Value. Gifts are considered dispositions for
income tax purposes and therefore any gift may trigger capital gains to the
Transferor. However, capital losses on gifts may be denied under the stop
loss rules.
The attribution rules will attribute income from property back to an
individual who may have transferred or loaned the property to split income.
Transfers include gifts and sales (even if at Fair Market Value). For
example, transfers or loans of property to a spouse (also common-law spouse)
will result in attribution of income and capital gains back to the spouse
who transferred the property. A taxpayer transferring or loaning property to
his or her spouse is still accountable for any capital gain, or loss, on the
sale of the property (including money). Also, transfers or loans of property
to a minor who is a non-arms-length person (for example, your child) will
also result in attribution of income (but not capital gains).
--
Paul A. Thomas, CPA
Athens, Georgia |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DB
Joined: 25 Aug 2007 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 7:19 pm Post subject: Re: Rules of Attribution |
|
|
"Paul Thomas, CPA" wrote in message $Mu4.14400@bignews7.bellsouth.net...
>
> "DB" wrote
>>I own 100% of my small corporation. What do I need to know about the
>>"Rules of Attribution"? Thanks.
>
>
>
> Do you have reason to believe they apply to you?
>
>
> http://www.cabusinessadvisor.com/Tax/TaxTraps/Attrib.htm
> There are tax rules to prevent excess income splitting. Collectively, the
> rules are generally known as the Attribution Rules. Simply stated, if a
> taxpayer has at any time transferred or assigned to a non-arm's length
> person the right to an amount which would otherwise have been included in
> your income, the amount transferred must be included in the transferor
> taxpayer's income for the year. Transfers include gifts or a sale, even if
> the sale is at Fair Market Value. Gifts are considered dispositions for
> income tax purposes and therefore any gift may trigger capital gains to
> the Transferor. However, capital losses on gifts may be denied under the
> stop loss rules.
>
> The attribution rules will attribute income from property back to an
> individual who may have transferred or loaned the property to split
> income. Transfers include gifts and sales (even if at Fair Market Value).
> For example, transfers or loans of property to a spouse (also common-law
> spouse) will result in attribution of income and capital gains back to the
> spouse who transferred the property. A taxpayer transferring or loaning
> property to his or her spouse is still accountable for any capital gain,
> or loss, on the sale of the property (including money). Also, transfers or
> loans of property to a minor who is a non-arms-length person (for example,
> your child) will also result in attribution of income (but not capital
> gains).
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Paul A. Thomas, CPA
> Athens, Georgia
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DB
Joined: 25 Aug 2007 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 7:23 pm Post subject: Re: Rules of Attribution |
|
|
"Paul Thomas, CPA" wrote in message $Mu4.14400@bignews7.bellsouth.net...
>
> "DB" wrote
>>I own 100% of my small corporation. What do I need to know about the
>>"Rules of Attribution"? Thanks.
>
>
>
> Do you have reason to believe they apply to you?
>
>
> http://www.cabusinessadvisor.com/Tax/TaxTraps/Attrib.htm
> There are tax rules to prevent excess income splitting. Collectively, the
> rules are generally known as the Attribution Rules. Simply stated, if a
> taxpayer has at any time transferred or assigned to a non-arm's length
> person the right to an amount which would otherwise have been included in
> your income, the amount transferred must be included in the transferor
> taxpayer's income for the year. Transfers include gifts or a sale, even if
> the sale is at Fair Market Value. Gifts are considered dispositions for
> income tax purposes and therefore any gift may trigger capital gains to
> the Transferor. However, capital losses on gifts may be denied under the
> stop loss rules.
>
> The attribution rules will attribute income from property back to an
> individual who may have transferred or loaned the property to split
> income. Transfers include gifts and sales (even if at Fair Market Value).
> For example, transfers or loans of property to a spouse (also common-law
> spouse) will result in attribution of income and capital gains back to the
> spouse who transferred the property. A taxpayer transferring or loaning
> property to his or her spouse is still accountable for any capital gain,
> or loss, on the sale of the property (including money). Also, transfers or
> loans of property to a minor who is a non-arms-length person (for example,
> your child) will also result in attribution of income (but not capital
> gains).
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Paul A. Thomas, CPA
> Athens, Georgia
>
>
>
I guess not. They asked in Sched. K if I owned more than 50%. I guess I
just wanted to know why.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
| Related Topics: | Where can I find attribution rules? I don't post here very regularly, but I have a question that I *know* I have read the answer to somewhere but can't find it now. Can someone point me to attribution rules regarding ownership of stock in an S Corp? Most specifically, I need to be able to p
Attribution rules S Corp partner in LLP Five individuals (accountants) each own an S Corp. Each S Corp is a partner in a LLP. The LLP will pay a small salary to the five individual owners (say, $600 per month)to enable them to participate in a Sec. 125 cafeteria plan of the LLP. (Shareholders o
IRA Rules I need some input on a proposed transaction involving a self-directed IRA that is being promoted by a consulting firm. An LLC is established to invest in partnership. The IRA will provide funds in exchange for 100% of the common units. The IRA owner wil
Who Rules America?
Co-ordinations rules between 401(k) and SEP-IRA? Taxpayer has a day job with Employer X. X has a 401(k) that TP participates in. X has some level of contribution matching. TP also has income and wants to set up a SEP-IRA for that. TP is to young to qualify for any "catch-up" contribu |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|