 |
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Dick Adams
Joined: 25 Aug 2007 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 2:03 pm Post subject: A note to out colleague Benjamin Yazersky |
|
|
Benjamin,
Please send me an e-mail with your valid e-mail
address to rdadams@panix.com.
Best regards,
Dick
--
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Archived from group: misc>taxes>moderated |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Wellman
Joined: 25 Aug 2007 Posts: 35
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:31 pm Post subject: Re: A note to out colleague Benjamin Yazersky |
|
|
On Feb 27, 8:03�am, rdad...@panix.com (Dick Adams) wrote:
> Benjamin,
>
> Please send me an e-mail with your valid e-mail
> address to rdad...@panix.com.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Dick
>
You are "outing" him here. Wow. Who knew?
--
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dick Adams
Joined: 25 Aug 2007 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:51 pm Post subject: Re: A note to out colleague Benjamin Yazersky |
|
|
Mike Wellman wrote:
> rdadams@panix.com (Dick Adams) wrote:
>> Please send me an e-mail with your valid e-mail
>> address to rdadams@panix.com.
> You are "outing" him here. Wow. Who knew?
Mike, Ah'm ROTFLMAO - after all these years
of buffering between you and the obnoxious
you-know-who, you of all people are accusing
me of "outing" someone.
There are very few people who will appreciate
the humor in this and only one wanker who will
threaten to sue me even though I failed to
mention his name.
None of this has to do with our professional
colleague Mr. Yazersky.
Dick
--
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Wellman
Joined: 25 Aug 2007 Posts: 35
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:37 pm Post subject: Re: A note to out colleague Benjamin Yazersky |
|
|
On Feb 27, 10:51�am, rdad...@panix.com (Dick Adams) wrote:
> Mike Wellman � wrote:
>
> > rdad...@panix.com (Dick Adams) wrote:
> >> Please send me an e-mail with your valid e-mail
> >> address to rdad...@panix.com.
> > You are "outing" him here. Wow. Who knew?
>
> Mike, Ah'm ROTFLMAO - after all these years
> of buffering between you and the obnoxious
> you-know-who, you of all people are accusing
> me of "outing" someone.
>
> There are very few people who will appreciate
> the humor in this and only one wanker who will
> threaten to sue me even though I failed to
> mention his name.
>
> None of this has to do with our professional
> colleague �Mr. Yazersky.
>
> Dick
>
I am glad you appreciated it Dick. Humor is the only thing that
brought me back from the brink.
--
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
| Related Topics: | MODERATOR: Please note: At this moment it appears that we will be moving home to North Carolina sometime in August. There will obviously be an outage at that time. So expect Congress to change some tax laws at that time. Dick <<
On a lighter note In the recent California primary and local election, the candidate for the post of Los Angeles County Assessor, John Low Taxes Loew, lost to the incumbent (78%-22%). John Loew had his middle name legally changed to "Low Taxes" before the election, so tha
Taxability of discounted note LLC (members are children and has a $300,000 (originally $1 million) note on the purchase of RE some years ago. The mortgage holder (grandfather) has consented to take $200,000 as a payment on the note. What
Moderator: A note to Shyster104 Please send me your e-mail address. << >> << The above is intended for educational purposes only. >> << It does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. >> << It cannot be used by any taxpa
Dividends via Share Redemption, Use of Promisory Note Since I posted my question concerning shareholder's redemption of shares, I think I have answer to that question. Apparently, Earnings and Profits in the year of redemption is determinant. The share redemption represents dividends to the extent of earnin |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|